Agenda item

'Talk with Us' Open Forum

To invite questions from the public present at the meeting on subjects other than those on the agenda.  The Committee would encourage members of the public with more complex issues to submit their question before the meeting to allow a substantive answer to be given.

Minutes:

7.1 The Chairman invited members of the public present at the meeting to ask questions. In response to these questions it was advised that:

·         With school places available, West Sussex County Council were able to allocate school places in line with 1 of 3 preferences expressed by parents. WSCC forecasted that Schools would reach net capacity by 2022/23.

·         A Member of the public raised concern over the use of the word ‘preference’ as in some instances it was felt that there had been no variety of choice for parents, based on their locality.

·         If a Maintained School was over-subscribed, allocation of school places would be conducted under the WSCC oversubscription criteria in accordance with the admissions code. This criteria included vulnerable children and children from low income families. Academies had their own over-subscription criteria. Each institution published their oversubscription criteria which was available for inspection by the public.

·         The Principle of Shoreham Academy advised that the oversubscription criterion for the academy was the same as the criteria expressed by maintained schools.

·         Officers advised that if the route from the home to the school was deemed an available walking route and nearest appropriate school is over three miles, transport may be provided. Concerns from the public were raised over the safety and suitability of some of the footpaths in the area. It was advised by officers that it was a parent’s legal responsibility to accompany children to schools where appropriate.

·         Officers advised that children at secondary schools would commonly travel via public transport, by foot or cycle. Concern was expressed by members of the public over the viability and safety of the walking routes that were available to children.

·         Walking routes to Schools could be challenged on their levels of reasonable safety by a criteria applied by the County Council. If they were deemed unsafe transport assistance could be considered.

·         Concern was expressed over the Ofsted Status of the Sir Robert Woodard Academy. Officers advised that they were able to challenge Maintained Schools on their status, however academies were challenged by the Regional Schools Commissioners Office. It was further advised that the Academy had made improvements to achieve better status in the future. Parents were encouraged to read the qualitative information included in the Ofsted report on the status of the Academy.

·         With regard to lateness/absence from Schools where mitigating factors were outside of the Child/Parent’s control, these would be considered and with on a case by case basis.

·         Cllr David Simmons advised rail travel would also be a viable option to travel to local Schools and encouraged parents to visit prospective secondary schools where possible.

·         A member of the public commented that the main concerns raised during the discussion were safer transport to schools and improving the Sir Robert Woodard academy. It was advised that parents would be more confident and hopeful for the future if they felt they had been listened to and understood.

·         Officers advised that whilst they did not have the authority to direct an academy schools to expand, there was no reason to believe there would be significant resistance from the Academy Trust. If there was, further discussions would take place with the Regional Schools Commissioners Office. West Sussex County Council had a statutory duty to provide school places for children across the County so if there were further resistances from the Regional Schools Commissioners Office, the County could lobby the Secretary of State. WSCC could direct maintained schools to accept a higher number of pupils than originally anticipated were necessary.

·         Officers advised the projected numbers for required school places were based on the adopted local plan and known housing developments, in addition to the date these housing developments were due to be delivered. It was further advised that was constant dialogue between the County Council and the Districts and Boroughs.

·         Officers advised that there was no identified need for a new secondary school immediately. Officers were confident that the projected numbers dictated this requirement was still a number of years away.

·         The County Council was working very closely with Districts and Boroughs to accurately predict realistic projections of necessary school places in the future, in addition to taking into account inward and outward migration.

7.2 The Chairman reminded the public gallery that the County Councillors were available to listen to issues and concerns and thanked officers for the informative presentation.